A ‘for and against’ essay

For a long time humanity has fought for freedom of expression, and since gradually thanks to our ancestors, have been gaining more of which could have imagined. Also true that social networking freedom of expression has happened was a weapon against innocent people.

Social networks have led to bullying and mobbing practice is much more widespread and anonymous, causing officials are not afraid of being discovered or the ability to distort the truth.

That does not mean I want to restrict freedom of expression on the internet, but toward making tools to resolve it I think we should educate the children of the world to non-violence or competitiveness and less jealousy. I think if we get this achievement should not be any problem.

For all this I think we should restrict mild form of children and adolescents who have not passed this education and be pretty sure that no misuse social networks.

"A FOR AND AGAINST ESSAY": Should we restrict freedom of speech on social networking sites?

"A FOR AND AGAINST ESSAY": Should we restrict freedom of speech on social networking sites?

Nowadays everybody have the oportunity of writting and talking on the social networks. This could be good in some cases and bad in others. I think the most important thing is make a polite and correct use of this sites. 

If the people does the things in good ways I think it’s positive having the oportunity of saying what everybody wants. Sometimes, we could learn lots of things by the opinion of the others. There are times that we don’t know the reasons why persons do things and by the opinion of them we could understand it. Honestly, I think it’s a good way of adquiring knowledge and changin opinions with people form every part of the world.

It’s true that there’s people that uses this sites in bad and unpolite ways. This is a big mistake because someone could be offended. Another bad use of social network it’s that some sites make campaings for diseases, like anorexia or bulimia, with young teenagers. Bullying is another example of bad use of social networks and it can be hurtfull for the boys or girls that received the attacs. 

In conlusion, I want to repeat that I agree the freedom of speech on socia network if the people does in good moods. We must try to evit the blogs or pages that insult o offend other people. 

In my opinion the issue of freedom of speech on social networking sites is a subject of debat today.Then you will see my my thoughts on this aspect.

First of all, I must say that I agree with freedom of expresion long as it is used in an ethical way so I can't tell negative arguments.Therefore my postive arguments are that poeple have freedom to upload any thing for all the people because you never know when you will need some information, however strange it.

On the other hand, I'm agree with freedom of expresion internet as long as internet content is controlled by some entity who is in charge of registering content network to can find any information of a violent or unpleasant.

In conclusion I think that freedom on networkneesd be free but controlled by somebody.

A ‘for and against’ essay, Cristian Borrallo Estevez, ASCT-2

A ‘for and against’ essay

Today we live in a world where technology it's all around us. Internet, is the biggest technological breakthrough of the century, we can download music, watch movies online, chat and etc, but in recent years there is a phenomenon that has grown at a dizzying pace: social networks.

What do we mean today by social network? It's a page that allows us to be in contact with people around the world. Today the three social networks most used in Spain are Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, but the question we ask is: What happen with our personal data ?, below i will tell you what for me are the pros and cons of social networks:

Pros: - Contact people : In fact that is the main objective of social networking, contact with each other. - Exchange of opinions and information: It is dangerous because, can be a good or bad thing, depending on how you use each of the info you publish and settings privacy that has everyone on your account. - Easy how to contact people: The main advantage of social networks, it's the reason for the success of, when more simple and easy social networking more possibilities there are for people to use.

Against: - Security of data entered: Perhaps the major concern of many people when entering a social network is that most of these social networks offer security system, but them aren't responsible for what may happen after you accept the conditions. It's one of the major drawback of social networks. - Distance from real life: It may sound like a joke, but some people spend hours using social networks without any kind of control and forgetting they real life.

Basically those are the pros and cons that exist in social networks of today, though it may seem, I am for them, because if used correctly, is something extremely useful for everyone.

Cristian Borrallo Estevez, ASCT-2

A ‘for and against’ essay Soraya Oliván

The famous bullfight in Pamplona is one of the principal tourist attractions in Spain every summer.
Where both men and women visit the city to take part in these bullfights or to see them.

The bullfight of bull is a tradition that goes back centuries behind and It is a form of which the people of Pamplona remember his history and celebrates his inheritance.
Thousands of persons of out of Spain are present at the bullfight every year, doing that this fact is a great economic contribution for this city. Since it helps to support the local economy of Pamplona That of another form would not be a tourist important destination.

During the bullfight, the bulls are not controlled and separation does not exist between the animals and the corridors. That's why the result can be very dangerous for the participants. Everything and that the city establishes the necessary precautions to protect to the corridors. But the corridors often ignore the rules or sometimes they run under the influence of alcohol and can be trampled or been gored by the bull.

In conclusion. I think that you have of taking mas safety measures with regard to the corridors for to avoid these accidents.

Should we restric freedom of speech on social networking?

The world has fought during a long time for the freedom of speech. I believe that this theme is very interesting. I don't think freedom of speech must be restricted, but, in the social networking we found many bulling cases and a lot of harassment. 

While bulling and harassment are happening every day, a lot of persons all over the world are suffering, and nobody is doing anything about. 
Many people think should stop this situation. Should there are someone stop this. 

However, I don't believe freedom of speech must be restricted, but if set up a limits. 
It's ok, freedom of speech, but, therefore not people can go insulting and hurt persons. 

On the other hand, always, exist bad persons will make hurt other persons, only for fun, and although not existed, they will continue hurting. 

A ‘for and against’ essay

A "FOR AND AGAINST" ESSAY

Nowadays new technologies, especially social networks, are available to everyone. These are used with absolute freely and people can write all of he want. Freedom of expression is one of the human right in "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", but to what extent a person can say what he wants.

On one hand, the opportunity for everyone to communicate through social networks is a great social advance. These networks allow us to be better informed about what is happening in the world and contrast information through the opinions of different people.

On the other hand, freedom of speech ends where it begins another person's freedom; so all that are said to go against someone or some ideal, personally, I think that this isn't freedom of speech. The insult through the network is easy, and I think I should be penalized. But not how does govern the actual Govern, I think it's better a "virtual punishment."

My opinion is clear, everyone can express their freedom of opinion whenever respectfully and without attacking the freedom of a third person.

Lluc Capdevila de la Cuesta